AUTHENTICATED POST-DEPLOYMENT CONTROL

A short technical demo showcasing script encryption, asset protection, and authenticated post-deployment control.
All narrative scripts, image assets, and audio files encrypted using AES-256-GCM. Standard extraction tools are non-functional.
Decryption keys exist only at runtime, fetched per session. Content remains encrypted at rest. No local key storage.
Invite code system with device tracking. Revocation capability. Usage monitoring.
72 documented attack vectors tested. Zero successful content extractions to date.






Administers Sekyuriti Protocol validation. Clinical. Detached.
Observes test subjects. Archives behavioral data.
Awakens in sterile laboratory. No memory of arrival.
Designated for threat recognition assessment.
The demo is short. The protection is real.
Because demonstrations should be engaging.
Wake up. Get tested. Validate the protocol.
You wake in a pristine white laboratory. Dr. Chen observes you like a specimen. You are designated Test Unit ALPHA-7.
This is a Sekyuriti Protocol validation. Your behavioral data will be archived. Your choices will be analyzed.
A short demo designed to showcase protection systems in a controlled environment.
Large volumes of images, audio, and video. Each file requires individual control.
Subscriber builds distributed before public release. Access windows must be enforced.
Windows, macOS, Android. Same content, different binaries. Unified control required.
Narrative stored in readable formats. Runtime compilation exposes source.
Check if user authorized → Allow access to unencrypted files
Files remain in standard formats (RPA-3.0)
Extraction trivial with common tools
Fetch runtime key → Decrypt content → Execute
Files encrypted with unique per-session keys
Standard tools return unusable data
EVALUATED UNDER CONTROLLED CONDITIONS
Attempts to extract keys or bypass protection through the runtime module
Attempts to extract assets directly from encrypted containers
Attempts to recover decrypted content or keys from system memory
Attempts to reverse engineer or patch the native protection layer
Attempts to find weaknesses in encryption implementation
Attempts to bypass authentication or generate unauthorized access
Attempts to intercept decrypted content during execution
Content remains controlled. Access remains validated. Authority remains intact.
Script line count includes engine overhead and comments. All content encrypted at rest.
Wake in sterile laboratory. Dr. Chen initiates protocol.
Threat recognition assessment. One choice. Two outcomes.
Behavioral data archived. Protocol complete.
OPEN evaluates encryption without access control. GATED demonstrates the full system. Generate a code to experience the difference.
No code required. Content encrypted. Standard extraction tools fail. Access is open.
Code required. Device tracked. Time-limited. Revocable. Full control demonstrated.
This demonstrates GATED mode.
Code is generated server-side. Device tracked. Auto-expires in 24 hours. Revocable.
Generate code above. Enter when prompted. 24hr expiry. 1 device.
Same content. Same encryption. Different control models.
GATED codes are device-locked and time-limited. That is the additional layer.
Content encrypted. Access validated.
Control does not degrade gameplay
Revocation and device tracking active
Same system available for all projects
That is the system.